× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The OP is on v5r2. but maybe he has BRMS....

Does a 730 even support v5r4, I don't think so.

Charles

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:46 PM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What loss of spool files?
SAVLIB LIB(X) DEV(TAP01) SPLFDTA(*ALL)

GO SAVE
20. Define save system and user data defaults
page down
Spooled file data . . . . . . *NONE *NONE, *ALL

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





Bill <brobins3d@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
09/25/2008 10:38 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: Replacing Disk Drives With Higher Capacity






Jones, John (US) wrote:
The incremental removal/replacement works, but will take days to
complete and you wind up with data that won't necessarily be distributed
across the disks evenly. Performance will also likely be impacted during
the removal process.

I'd do it (and have done it) the old fashioned way:
- GO SAVE/21.
- GO SAVE/21 again just in case.
- Power off.
- Pull all old drives out, noting the slot where each drive came from.
- Put the replacement drives in.
- Power up, DST, start mirroring & add to ASP.
- GO RESTORE/21.

If something goes wrong you can power off & put the old drives back in
(since their slot was noted).

This has the most user downtime but you end up with the most optimal
data layout (best performance).

And result in a loss of all spooled files and all of the other niceties
that are lost in this scenario. Appreciate the thought though.


BTW, if your apps will work on a newer OS release, upgrading to a 550
with a dozen 141GB disks would probably pay for itself in reduced
maintenance and power/HVAC costs while running circles around the 730. And
take 8 or 9 Us in one rack v. about two full racks worth of space for the
730 + DASD tower.

And incur a new key charge from Infor for daring to improve my machine.
Same for Extol's EDI package. It's been a year or two, but the last
time I spec'd a machine, it was over 100 grand to get a machine -near-
the performance of the 730/1506. So, unless a 550 runs on the power of
a 60 watt bulb, it'd take quite some time to recoup the expenses you
speak of.

Bill
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.