×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
"The availability of SQL access is neither a sufficient condition for a
database system to be relational, nor a necessary one.
The same can also be said for the lack of availability of other forms of
access."
But, the accepted fact in world-class RDBMS world (DB2 mainframe, ORACLE)
"You seem to be the only one here with that opinion."
On here, what would you expect?
And if anybody outside the OS/400 world looks askance at the OS/400 implementation of
DB2, the most likely explanation that comes to my mind is that their
implementations aren't built into the operating system, much less into
the licensed internal code."
What has that got to do with anything? But what is of relevance is that mainframe DB2 and ORACLE are the acknowledged leader in the RDBMS world; DB2/400 isn't even talked about in that realm. Too bad but it doesn't have viability in the market place like DB2 mainframe and ORACLE.
Dave
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
Re: Modernization and multi-member files, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
