Re: Modernization and multi-member files

Dave Odom wrote:

I sure can defend my argument but why should I with you as you wouldn't acknowledge the proof if it were given.

Oh shenanigans, DaveDaveDave!

Please, give us any proof at all other than your say so, or your say so that others say so. Even though I don't consider Codd's rules to be gospel, point to one that DB2 doesn't follow. Or point to a single post anywhere on the internet from an acknowledged expert that agrees with your position.

In fact, I have given you proofs that would convince someone non-i5 religious.

Name one.

But, you simply can't see anything wrong with how the i works nor its Goldberg implementation of DB2. And I simply didn't have nor do I have time to argue religion with someone that won't acknowledge any other thinking beside their own.

See, when I point out the proof behind my position (namely the fact that DB2 passes Codd's rules), then you have to match that with proof of your position. Otherwise, your position is untenable. It's called rules of debate, and is another set of rules with which you are unfamiliar.

And that disappoints me about you as I highly respect you in many other things but here you are as set in your ways as you can be.

Yeah, but see I have the luxury of proof on my side. You have... nothing.

Joe