Re: Ambient Temperature Shutdown

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

  FYI only... Some reference information:

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/systems/topic/iphdx/sa76-0089.pdf
Various Ambient Temperature SRC listed.
"11007203  Ambient  temperature  exceeded  limit
Servicer  Response:
The  system  will  shut  down  in  15  minutes.  Follow
instructions for the items listed in the FRU List."

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/systems/topic/areb7/ambtemp.htm
"Is the room temperature less than 35 degrees C or 95 degrees F?"

Regards, Chuck

ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> One additional question... does anyone know what ambient temperature
> level triggers the message?
>
> Looking for some more advice or past experiences here...
>
> We had an cooling related event sometime over the weekend and things 
> finally got hot enough for our development box early yesterday
> morning.  It threw two CPPEA5A messages to QSYSOPR before shutting
> down suddenly (messages sent at 6:47 and then 7:04).  Behind the
> scenes, it was logging a 11007203 SRC code, which means that the
> ambient temp is too high and shutdown will occur in 15 minutes.  The
> system was down before 15 minutes elapsed after the second message,
> though.
>
> In conjunction with the first CPPEA5A and 11007203 messages, the
> system also threw a CPF1816 about the utility power failing.  Our UPS
> is in a different room unaffected by the system room cooling, etc.
>
> We are monitoring and notifying pagers for the utility power 
> failed/restored/etc. type events, but the ambient temp message is a
> new concern.  What i'm wondering is, when a CPPEA5A occurs, is the
> CPF1816 utility power message always sent also?   There was really no
> other explanation for the CPF1816 unless it was 'triggered' by the
> CPPEA5A...
>
> The system handled things well coming back up and threw one more
> warning 11007201 message before issuing the 11007202 that things were
> back within normal ambient temp range, but it has been a pretty messy
> morning.
>
> Is anyone more familiar with the ambient temperature based events?
> Is anyone monitoring for such events?