Walden H. Leverich wrote:
My understanding is the new pricing model is _named_ user, not
concurrent user. So if I have a day operator, a night operator, a
weekend operator, and someone that covers when someone is out sick I
need 4 licenses, not one. Am I incorrect?
Named users vs. concurrent users is a big issue. I've suggested on several occasions in my articles and on this list that people sit down and figure out the ramifications to their companies and really hammer IBM with their concerns. I know that at least one person at IBM is going to say that the operators can just sign on with the same user profile, but that sort of answer isn't going to fly in heavily Sarboxed shops.

The last I heard, named is the way IBM is going. Now is the time to make noise about it.

Joe

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].