Re: Consolidating multiple iSeries systems...

I think you want the object authority and user profiles to be specific to
each set of libraries. The idea being that if user's accidently use an
object in another company's application they will get an authority error -
which will point you to what has to be corrected.

-Steve

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:43 PM, David Turnidge <daveturnidge@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Well, that's been rejected out of hand because of the hardware costs...

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Mike Cunningham <mcunning@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Run an LPAR for each of your current systems

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Turnidge
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 3:36 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Consolidating multiple iSeries systems...

Management has chosen to get off the mid-range and go to .NET based
systems.
I have been tasked with finding out what issues there will be to
consolidate
each of the iSeries data on one system for historical look-up purposes.

Fortunately, our data libraries are uniquely named, so that shouldn't be

a

problem. Unfortunately, our program libraries are named the same, and
there
are programs with the same name but different base source, but I think I
have a way around that.

So far I have come up with a number of issues, in no particular order:

1) Will need to analyze all of our Robot jobs to determine what is
company specific and still required.

2) Will need to set up user profiles for each user and resolve the
few
cases of duplication.

a. Is there a way to automate this?

b. Will need a way for certain users to go from company to company.
(Multiple profiles?)

c. Will need a way for programmers to go from company to company.
(Software controlled from command line?)

3) Need to create device descriptions and resolve duplicate names.
I'm
thinking as much as possible the device names should be the same as they
are
now.

4) What to do with job descriptions in QGPL that have library

lists.

Have multiple QGPLxx libraries and control it by library list? I think
QGPL
might hold more issues than are obvious.

5) Programs with hard coded library names.

I am looking for any other ideas that you might have. Especially if you
have
already had to do this process and can warn of precipices that are ahead
of
me...?

Thank you,

Dave
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.