× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Jones, John (US) wrote:

For me iNav (V5R4 SI27741) runs OK on Vista. Better than it did on my
old XP laptop, but I attribute that more to the better hardware (dual
core, 4GB RAM) than software.

Personal experience only --

I don't run Vista yet, so I can't compare there. However, iNav runs on my 512MB/900MHz W2K Pro laptop in a third (and much better in numerous functions) of the time that it runs on my 2GB/2.2Ghz XP desktop system. I simply avoid using it on my desktops (I have a couple here) and run it on the laptop unless I absolutely need the explicit connection.

Given the incredible slowdown (in iNav and some other non-MS software) I've seen from a smaller, older, slower laptop with obsolete Windows to a bigger, new, faster desktop with more modern Windows, I've resisted going to the next level and jumping to Vista.

If speedup tips are available for iNav, I'd be more than happy to go another step.

Tom Liotta


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.