×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Wow. That has to make you think a bit. Save performance can be
influenced by a number of factors. By simply adding disk drives one
would not expect to see a change - unless that change is actually
impacting another component.
GB per hour is a factor of target device, connection (fibre/SCSI),
HSL/Expansion Unit/IOA placement, disk configuration, cpu/memory, and
data type. LTO1 has an engineering spec of 108GB hour.
Are you absolutely sure that there has been no other change in your
environment? You have changed the disk configuration but your type of
change I would not expect that kind of impact. Normally you would
assume that additional drives would help a bit. It may make sense to
supply us with more information regarding your config if you are
comfortable with that. Types and counts of drives, attached to what
kind of IOP. Were these new drives added to existing IOP's and arrays?
With the new drives did data get spread properly (are you sure that all
drives are within spec and at levels similar to prior the install)? Do
you have any idea if any particular part of the save process is now
longer? All of it or can you tell if a certain time/area is running
longer?
It's hard to assume that there hasn't been a change in CPU/memory or
data type. I might guess that you crossed some sort of threshold on
your IOP and supported devices but that would be new and very strange to
me. I would tend to lean towards something else going on. Some other
type of problem/conflict.
Michael Crump
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f
Allow me to respond to your coherent argument in a way that only you can
understand: If a grapefruit is happier than a bulldozer, then that means
your toaster can turn jam into sound. Sincerely, Dogbert
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. If it did, it would be
folded, mutilated, watered down, politically corrected, and would show
up a week later if at all. If you are not the intended recipient of
this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them,
nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Goade
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 9:48 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Disk addition and LTO1 backups
We have an LPAR on an i570 that had a little over 1TB of disk space and
backed up, using BRMS over fiber, to dual LTO1 drives. The backup time
was approximately 3.5 hours give or take depending on the usage of the
system. A while back we added 400GB of disk to the LPAR that is now at
approx. 1.4TB. With similar disk usage to before (not percentage, but
GB
used), our backups are now taking over 6 hours. Has anyone ever
experienced this or have an explanation? Any help is much appreciated.
Regards,
Andy
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.