× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



But if I get a performance boost, I'll change my ways...... <

There is no performance difference between explicit (i.e. JOIN) and implicit
(i.e. WHERE) syntax. Internally it's the same join processing.

I agree that explicit JOIN syntax is more legible, portable and maintainable
(be kind to the "next" guy). Also there are some explicit joins that are
difficult to do and understand using traditional WHERE syntax (i.e.
EXCEPTION join).

All that said, you still need to know traditional manner of joining using
WHERE clause, as UPDATE and DELETE don't support explicit join syntax but do
support implicit joins.

Elvis

Celebrating 10-Years of SQL Performance Excellence on IBM i5/OS and OS/400
www.centerfieldtechnology.com


-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: SQL 'Select AS' syntax

Pete


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.