×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
There's a lot of SCM vendors out there that are glad that WDSC does not
"include" it.
There's little incentive for IBM to include this. Let's face it, if IBM
included that in their "advanced" edition of WDSC, at the increased price,
would that be the straw that caused a lot of people to upgrade to
advanced? Or, would we get the uproar that we got with the preview of the
new screen designer? Or, once again, how IBM should include WDSC at no
charge to anyone so they can develop applications and thus sell more iron?
If IBM included it at no charge it would only raise their expenses, and
royally vex several SCM vendors.
IBM bought a HA vendor. However, I don't see an immediate assimilation of
that company and HA now becoming a mere option to 57##SS1 or some such
thing. (Although I've argued for years that customers would like to see
such a vital issue tightly integrated and closely supported by IBM).
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
RE: Automate source code backup to SVN, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
