× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Will this allow round tripping without a table? If the number of machines is 7, does that mean the number of companies is 7, too? If you are going to use a table, would it be possible/useful to use a 2-digit table for company/division, and use the existing 5 digit number for the rest of the number?
Paul Nelson wrote:
All of that is over my head. They have 7 machines now and will consolidate
them to one over the next two years. I think I will start with the machine
number as the first digit and start with 000001 for the first employee and
work my way up from there.

Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adam Glauser
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 7:43 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Calling all math wizards

> Paul Nelson wrote:
> A client has posed an interesting problem. His employee master file
> contains a 2 digit company number, a 3 digit division number, and a
> 5 digit employee number. He needs to have some math done to generate
> a unique 7 digit number.

Don wrote:
Something tells me that there's a hash out there that could do the trick
for
you here..


A one-way hash was the first thing that came to mind for me too. Paul could use the Qc3CalculateHash (QC3CALHA) API in an SQL stored procedure. However, there are a couple of potential problems with this approach.

1. The shortest possible hash value using the API comes from the MD5 algorithm. The length of an MD5 hash is 16 bytes. Paul would still need to map from this hash value to a 7 digit number, introducing more opportunity for collisions. Of course, it should be possible to test for every possible combination of company number, division and employee number, but it might take far too long.

2. It isn't feasible to go from the hash value to the number. It is unclear whether round-tripping is a requirement or not.

3. The Qc3CalculateHash API wasn't introduced until V5R3.

Hope this helps,
Adam


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.