|
-----Original Message-----I
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jones, John (US)
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:51 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SAVF too large for FTP
V5R3 supports DTACPR as well; I use it at *MEDIUM all the time. On a
typical library containing PFs I get 80-90% compression. For instance
recently saved a 149GB library to a 17GB SAVF.
You might also try to CHGFTPA and up the inactivity timeout. I've seen
it in the past where a session would timeout even though a transfer was
in progress.
--
John A. Jones, CISSP
Senior Analyst, Global Information Security
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
tel: +1-630-455-2787 fax: +1-312-601-1782
john.jones@xxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:28 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SAVF too large for FTP
We are on v5r3 on both machines.
Dave
Have you looked at V5R4's DTACPR(*HIGH) or *MED? Compared to these
DTACPR(*YES) is a sick joke.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.