|
From small generators, to big generators (particularly at those highwayconstruction job sites since
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Nelson
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:07 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Thin Clients
Take a ride over to the WTC site during the day, and tell me
if that would be conducive to your suggestions. Better yet, a
highway construction job, where there is no power at all.
A grader operator can work on 10 different cost codes during
the day. The foreman is responsible for recording all that
stuff, because that can result in several different pay
rates. Your suggestions are just not feasible in that kind of
environment. I know, because I have lived it. I have worked
as an equipment operator and as a foreman.
How do you think I lost my finger? :-))
Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 11:49 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Thin Clients
Paul,
I am not suggesting that foremen type anything. What if the
construction workers swiped their security card over the time
machine .. er.. time card machine when they arrived and when
they left? Or, they have an RFID chip implanted into their
earlobe .. er.. their badge? How about biometric systems
needing you to swipe your fingerprint, where you cannot even
cheat by chopping off someone else's thumb :-) - sure, dirty
hands may require a different solution, but there are a lot
of choices in this, the 21st century!
There are business reasons to justify spending money that
does not contribute to the revenue stream. If you can spend
less administrative time in entering data, and less time
fixing human errors, and less time paying for workers who
clock someone else in, and.... you can reduce costs. That
impacts the bottom line in a positive manner, so it seems a
good business reason to me. Are construction companies not
good at business??
Trevor
On 9/13/07 12:38 PM, "Paul Nelson" <nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<< Why on earth are you still using ANY form of keyboarddata entry in
the 21st century?>>21st
I guess you've never been out on a construction site. Those foremen
don't type so well. Plus, construction companies are loathe to add
anything that doesn't contribute to the revenue stream.
:-))
Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 11:08 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Thin Clients
Why on earth are you still using ANY form of keyboard data entry in
the
century?modernize their
People complain all the time about not knowing how to
applications - here is the BEST example of how to start themodernize a data
modernization process. It costs relatively little to
entry application-
beyond the green to GUI part, and the ROI is quick.Or..... I did
How about RFID? Or, scanning and OCR? Or, web services?
one project a couple of years ago where we went from(maximum of) 80
orders entered in a day by hand, to 500 orders a day using an FTP(pre-web
solution
services). The data entry function went from hundreds ofkeystrokes to
four
or five clicks per order, and the occasional data entry for100%. The next
exceptions. We still had the human eye on the order, but we reduced
human error and improved order entry accuracy to almost
step will be tohave
the web orders entered by the customers directly into theDB2 database
- where the workflow will still require human touch, but only tothroughput over
review and approve. In the end, we increased web order
500%, andthere
is no concept of (batch) human data entry any more.the question
There are so many ways to replace data entry today, that
ofhow
fast data entry should be in a browser is moot.better than GUI
First step... modernize your thinking.
Second step... modernize all your human data entry functions.
Third step... get kudos from your company for increasing throughput.
Fourth step... stop telling midrange-L green screen is
for anything :-)
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email:
MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change
list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting,
please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.