×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Although restoring only user data might seems acceptable, doing the migration ensures some things which were not accounted for in planning [e.g. unregistered external stored procedures, distribution queues, job schedule entries, etc.] should not end up being an "Oops! I did not consider that." Using a full system restore in that migration can also serve as an effective DR test; even if to a different release and only the first steps. With the migration path there is also no concern for what of OMIT() and OPTION(*NEW) will not have restored into QGPL & QUSRSYS since the full libraries would be restored with the old-release objects.data; also ensuring that nobody messes up the system by forgetting OPTION(*NEW) and using ALWOBJDIF(*ALL). RSTCFG, RDBDIRE, and System Values are the only things I can think of at the moment [I did not review the migration path documentation] which are required to be moved/corrected in the migration scenario, and the other noted considerations [e.g. directory entries and tcp/ip configurations] should be automatically updated as part of [what appears to be to the install code for v5r3m0] a supported N+2 upgrade over v5r1m0.

Regards, Chuck

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.