×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Joe Pluta wrote:
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Thank you too. I don't know how many times I asked this list if the
people supporting old releases are actually making NEW sales on releases
no longer supported by IBM and never heard a response.
Rob, I'd bet that the majority of people making sales to shops that are on
back releases are the smaller utility companies that are helping companies
band-aid their existing machines.
I agree that "making sales" heavily favors newer systems.
OTOH, long-term ongoing maintenance fees can often come from systems
that remain stable... ummm... long-term. Maintenance streams fund a
lot of work. I'm not sure how easy it is (for management of sales
divisions, etc.) to leave behind customers that have been faithfully
making fee payments for years.
I see you Joe added a relevant comment later in the thread. But I
wanted to emphasize a point about the 'management of sales
divisions, etc.' that I just mentioned.
A number of comments have used the term "software vendors". The term
feels like it's implying some single individual who wrote a program
or application and is selling it. It often _starts_ with an
individual who achieves some success, then it becomes a 'company'.
More success might turn it into a 'corporation' and attract venture
capital (in either order). The corporation then has a Board of
Directors, often heavily involving investors. The Board appoints
executive officers.
And at some point, there're likely to be influences in various
directions as years go by -- one VP in charge of Sales who builds up
a steady maintenance stream might be replaced by someone who focuses
on new product sales. Or investors might change -- some who want a
steady stream for ROI might sell to some who look for a rapid
turnaround of quick profit.
I.e., a 'software vendor' can be a very fluid entity that's not easy
to pin down.
Just an observation; not an endorsement nor criticism of any
principle. Individuals tend to be different; "software vendors" can
be a varied group of individuals under a single roof.
Tom Liotta
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.