× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I used to have the same problems Darrell when I had WDSC on an older PC.

But since I've gone to 6.0.1, with ALL 28 hours worth of downloads of the
latest PTFs for it (I'm not exaggerating. It took me 28 hours over DSL to
get all those PTFs for this for my PC), it runs pretty fast.

This is on both my desktop with 2 gig of memory and on my laptop with 1 gig.

I think if you upgrade the PTFs and if you upgrade your RAM, you will see a
noticeable difference.

Shannon O'Donnell



-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Darrell A Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:30 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Who is using WDSC, who is using PDM/SEU?

Dale:

We have WDSC on all of our programmers' PCs, and on mine. We all love what
it can do, potentially.

It is dog slow.

Now, it is emphatically possible that we just tried to use it too soon;
perhaps newer PCs with astronomical quantities of memory and huge disk
caches could disabuse us of the molasses in January notion. Whatever that
case may be, most of us, after an initial "it will get better as I learn it"
honeymoon, have reverted to PDM/SEU for at least some things. I don't see
WDSC on screen too much. However, there are features in WDSC that are not
just clones of green screen, and for those it is worth it to have WDSC
taking up disk space.

Darrell

Darrell A. Martin - 630-754-2141
Manager, Computer Operations
dmartin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 06/20/2007 01:58:24 PM:

Question, though, for this panel. How many of you are using WDSC and
how
many are still using PDM/SEU? I can't get my programmers to move onto
WDSC, and it looks like it should be sweet! They say it's too slow and
cumbersome..... and they ARE very fast.

If I did more programming (which I sadly don't have time for), I'd be
doing
a more thorough shakedown myself.

Opinions, please?

Dale Gindlesperger





This e-mail, including attachments, may contain information that is
confidential and/or proprietary, and may only be used by the person to whom
this email is addressed. If the recipient of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or an authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If
this e-mail has been delivered to you in error, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and deleting this e-mail immediately.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.