×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
My point must have been missed... Restore *does* keep the value from
the Saved dataspace object; see the suggested modification to the given
scenario and then review/verify the results. What was discussed was
*recovery* activity which is _beyond_ just restore. There are already
actions being taken in the given scenario, beyond restore, to effect
recovery -- the APYJRNCHG itself. Recovery should be rare.
I am not saying that storing the updated identity attribute along
with the insert data can not be done, nor that there would be no value
in so doing. In fact I stated that with regard to the NEXT VALUE, it is
"a valid point that it would be nice if it could be applied" during the
APYJRNCHG. However I added that.... In wishing to be able to effect
that, by applying journaled changes as compared to the relatively
low-cost method of adding an ALTER RESTART WITH as part of DR, "the
*cost* is an issue that must be considered". Cost, as compared to the
expectation that the value is to be tracked with every [insert] journal
entry.
Additionally... Submitting a DCR for inferred as missing function
*should* be done. I intended to give extra information about what I
thought was a resolution to the concern; i.e. a stored procedure to
effect the change/ALTER after the APYJRNCHG [just like the HA sfw does].
Regards, Chuck
-- All comments provided "as is" with no warranties of any kind
whatsoever and may not represent positions, strategies, nor views of my
employer
Walden H. Leverich wrote:
FWiW: The journaled changes are the data. The attribute of identity
value at each insert is not row data, and the value is not separately
recorded/tracked neither in its own entry nor as part of the row entry.
Sorry, I can't really buy that. What you're saying is it's ok that there is no way to "restore" a file to a point in time using the native save/restore methods in i5/OS. Issuing an alter-table isn't a valid part of a save/restore process, IMHO. This is clearly a DCR candidate.
-Walden
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.