Re: i5/OS is better than Linux.

<snip>i5/OS is better than Linux because it provides integrated call stack
support and exception handling. Linux does not. To my knowledge, you
cant WRKJOB on a Linux process, view the call stack, hold the job and
place it in debug mode, then use a source code debugger to step up and
down the call stack to find your applications problem.
</snip>

Steve are you feeling okay??? now if we can only convince you that
Windoze falls into the same inferior OS class...

Thanks,
Tommy Holden




"Steve Richter" <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
04/10/2007 01:49 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
i5/OS is better than Linux.






On 4/10/07, Lukas Beeler <l.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Today, IBM released a new machine, the System i 515.



It's aimed at the SMB market. Even though pricing isn't out yet in
Europe, it still doesn't look like a good offer.

God damnit IBM, i5/OS is so very cool, but the hardware you sell is
several years old and slow (and probably overpriced, but I don't know
that yet).

this final point about i5/OS is so true. esp compared to Linux.
Arguably, you could compile GNU C code in ILE C. The parts that dont
compile could be corrected using the excellent compiler preprocessor
APIs of i5/OS. ( .NET does not provide the multiple source code views
of the executable in its debugger that i5/OS provides. ) The end
result would be all GNU C applications could run native on i5/OS.

i5/OS is better than Linux because it provides integrated call stack
support and exception handling. Linux does not. To my knowledge, you
cant WRKJOB on a Linux process, view the call stack, hold the job and
place it in debug mode, then use a source code debugger to step up and
down the call stack to find your applications problem.

-Steve