RE: newer backup methods was: Accidentally Lost Data

There seems to be less trust of tape in the Intel/PC world than in the 
larger systems world. Perhaps that distrust is a carry over from the lower 
end tape drives that have traditionally been used with PCs. The idea of 
using disk drives as backup seems to fall apart when you get into 
archiving data and using multi-generational backups, such as the familiar 
daily/weekly tape sets the larger systems use.  It's also difficult to get 
management to spend as much or more than a new server for a tape backup 
system. 

Steve

Steven Morrison
Fidelity Express 
903-885-1283  ext. 479



"Jones, John (US)" <John.Jones@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
03/20/2007 01:16 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: newer backup methods was: Accidentally Lost Data






V-tape: If you used virtual tape for your saves, you'd need to move them
to a network drive somewhere.  If you want to use them to recover the
iSeries it's kinda useless if they're still on the iSeries needing
recovery.  So you need another server (SAN/NAS count as 'servers') and
the associated expense.  If you go to the expense to build that
infrastructure, I'd suspect the restore process would be similar to what
happens for Windows today: Load the base OS from media, configure the
connection to the network share, copy the data over and restore from
that or restore directly 'over the wire'.  Effort-wise it's probably not
too bad but I'd hazard a guess a D IPL is simpler.


Vista: A USB drive is a USB drive.  Why should it matter at all if the
drive is solid state or platter-based?  Either way you can partition
them, format as FAT32 or NTFS, and do whatever else you'd care to do.

16GB Flash drives are out and are under $150 (
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233042 ).
That's plenty for a modest OS + apps + My Documents set up.  Or just My
Docs for incremental/differential backups.

I'm not trying to argue here; you may well be right about MS' approach.
IMO, though, there's no functional difference and MS shouldn't be
dictating what storage media customers use.