× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2007

Re: classic JVM vs J9 JVM

Is this like just a lot of speculation?  I am not seeing much at
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct01004c/systems/support/i/planning/upgrade/future.html
I am sure that if it was coming up then IBM would put something there. 
After all, the last time they dropped a JVM, (which spelled the doom of R5 
of Domino on current releases of i5/os, and you had to upgrade Domino), 
they gave lots of notice.
I'm the one who had them upgrade
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct01004c/systems/support/i/planning/upgrade/v5r3/software.html
by pointing out the dropping of that particular JVM meant an upgrade to R6 
of Domino, and they needed to explicitly mention the forced upgrade.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.