× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I load/apply immediate the one ptf si26555, but assume will need ipl to clear
temp storage space. Will have to schedule that.... The ptf doesn't seem to
indicate any of IBM's own programs might be the problem but lets hope.
I just checked only other system I have put cume on, and it had a similar
increase in temp storage used. I've applied ptf and was able to ipl (a
development machine). Temp storage went down 1.5 gig (from 5.5 to
4.0 gig). I do see it is the QIBMHELP process that is chewing up
resources after ipl, and temp storage increased from 2 to 4 gig.
On a very small machine, with only 35 gig, this makes a big difference.
I'll ask the QIBMHELP question in another thread.
jim franz

----- Original Message ----- From: <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:04 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: temp storage since cume c7002540


Any possibility?
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.nsf/ibmscdirect/064EED642D6D78A58625714E0076157B

Found this at:
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.nsf/recommendedfixes
and selecting "Temporary Disk Space".

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Jim Franz" <franz400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
02/12/2007 03:46 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
<MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Fax to

Subject
temp storage since cume c7002540






Applied cume this weekend to a 35gig model 800.
After ipl, we watched disk space usage go from 73% to 84%
in first 10 minutes. Looked at archives & was a thread sort of
linking temp storage space & QSRVMON and system value
qsfwerrlog. Turned value off, ipl, same problem (although the
30 to 40 "srv" jobs no longer running. Temp storage
usually just over a gig. Now over 4 gig. Can see a number
of IBM "q" programs running after ipl, but can't see what's normal
and what's not.
Any ideas (before I open a ticket with IBM)?
jim franz
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.