× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Justin, are you sure about that?

If this partition really only runs the one job, as the OP said, and the
system CPU is at ++++.  Then would adding another processor help?  I
don't believe that the iSeries can spilt a single job between 2
processors, a jobs only runs on one processor at a time right?

With just a single job involved, the most work you can get is a single
physical CPU's work of work.

Is he currently getting a physical CPU's worth of work?  Given that the
OP is talking about partitions, he'd need to look at his partition setup
since with partitions you're dealing with physical and virtual
partitions.

If the OP has a single physical CPU assigned to the partition, and that
CPU is being maxed out on this one job; the only way to get more work
would be too add CPU(s) AND split the job into multiple jobs.

Splitting the job could be very easy.  For example, if the job reads
from record #1 to record #1,000,000 split it into 2 jobs one that
handles records 1-500,000 the other handles 500,001 to 1,000,000.
Assuming a 2 CPU system and storage subsystem that can support it,
you'll get done in half the time.

I remember reading an article, I think from the IBM teraplex Center,
that discussed this method of improving batch jobs.  

Lastly, when looking at the DASD subsystem, we need to know if the job
uses journal files and rather or not it uses commitment control.

HTH,

Charles Wilt
--
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
  

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Haase, Justin C.
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:38 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Multiple processors

Depends if it's bound by processor, disk, memory, what have you.

If the job is running at +++++ CPU, yes, processor would help.

If it's running at 1.7% CPU and your disks are at 100% busy, no amount
of processor will help.

How's the system look? 


--
Justin C. Haase - Solution Engineer
IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i
Kingland Systems Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve McKay
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:36 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Multiple processors

We have a partition which runs *one* batch job and one interactive
session for the operator that checks on the batch job occasionally.
This batch job runs for days at a time and when it finishes, another
similar job is kicked off by the operator.  We want to reduce the run
time of the batch job.  One suggestion is to add another processor to
the partition.  I'm not convinced that adding another processor will
improve the run time.  So my dumb question for today is:

Will adding another processor to a partition running a single 
batch job
decrease the run time of the batch job?

Thanks,

Steve 


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, 
please take a
moment to review the archives at 
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail communication, including 
attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications 
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential, and may be 
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient or 
believe you received this communication in error, please 
reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy 
you received.  In addition, retention, dissemination, 
distribution, copying, or otherwise use of the information 
contained in this communication is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.

-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.