× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Depends if it's bound by processor, disk, memory, what have you.

If the job is running at +++++ CPU, yes, processor would help.

If it's running at 1.7% CPU and your disks are at 100% busy, no amount
of processor will help.

How's the system look? 


--
Justin C. Haase - Solution Engineer
IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i
Kingland Systems Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve McKay
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:36 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Multiple processors

We have a partition which runs *one* batch job and one interactive
session for the operator that checks on the batch job occasionally.
This batch job runs for days at a time and when it finishes, another
similar job is kicked off by the operator.  We want to reduce the run
time of the batch job.  One suggestion is to add another processor to
the partition.  I'm not convinced that adding another processor will
improve the run time.  So my dumb question for today is:

Will adding another processor to a partition running a single batch job
decrease the run time of the batch job?

Thanks,

Steve 


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail communication, including attachments, is 
covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is 
confidential, and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient or believe you received this communication in error, please reply to 
the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In addition, 
retention, dissemination, distribution, copying, or otherwise use of the 
information contained in this communication is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.