× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 1/9/07, Chris Payne <CPayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The reason for this is that the where conditions are applied before
aggregation and the having clause is applied after aggregation, so if
you wanted to use a sum() function and then drop all of the rows that
did not have a certain sum, you would have to use a having clause. I
assume that it has to come after the group by because it needs to count
up the rows before it can check the having clause, and it needs the
group by to know how to count up the rows.


That seems to make sense.  I was wondering how the SQL engine would
distinguish the pre- and post-aggregation when I had the count(*) test in
the WHERE clause.

Thanks,
Dan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.