|
Steve Richter wrote:
I dont think IBM itself knows how to write an OS anymore. This is not a slight, OSes and languages are not the core part of their business that they once were.
Um, when was the last time you had a serious problem with i5/os? When was the last time DB2/400 was hosed on you? Sure, there are inconveniences ... but, in my experience, with the exception of vendor and user error ... I've *NEVER* had a serious problem with the iBox where I was shut down. Oh, I'm sure Al Barsa could relate a few tales ... but that's his job <grin>.
Could Zend do it? Why not? Hire a bunch of Linux kernel experts. Then turn the system into a PHP engine or something.
Uh, right ... I've had problems with just about EVERY linux upgrade I've ever done ... none of them were completely seamless. When I upgraded to Fedora Core 4 my database was hosed for a while. Sorry, i5/os and Linux are *NOT* in the same class... and so are the people who develop them. Don't take this wrong ... I think Linux is great ... and I'm going to continue to run midrange.com on linux. But if I have a business critical application, I want it running on a System i under i5/os tested and supported by IBM. david (who is putting his flag back in the drawer for a bit)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.