Re: IFS File CHGAUT Oddity

on top of those problems, running a pgm with adopted authority  (as the
*owner instead of *user) does no better.

object authorities are inherited from the parent directory.
jim franz

To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:19 PM
Subject: IFS File CHGAUT Oddity

Here's an interesting one:

We have a process where we need to do a CHGAUT command on an IFS file to
change authorities.

Ran into an odd situation where *PUBLIC has *RWX authority to an IFS file,
but USERX cannot call the CHGAUT command to change authorities.  The file
is owned by USERY.  USERY can call CHGAUT.

Here's the error that occurs: CPFA0B1 - "Requested operation not allowed.
Access problem."

Hmmmm I thought.  Full object authority should allow me to run CHGAUT
against an object.

Next I added an individual user authority for USERX to the file and set
the user's authority to *RWX on the file and gave the user full object
authorities.

Still CHGAUT failed when called by USERX.

Here's the interesting thing.  USERX can still open/read/write or delete
the file.

Seems that only the owner of an IFS file or someone with *ALLOBJ authority
can issue a CHGAUT command against an IFS file object even if they have
full rights.

Any thoughts on this ?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
"Providing Your....iNFORMATION NOW!"
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 898-3038
Fax: (952) 898-1781
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
--

This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list

To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.