|
I used SourceRetrieval for a client once. The client's software vendor
wanted to GOUGE them to move to a different machine to get more DASD and
horsepower, even though the actual number of users had decreased. The
client didn't want to abandon the platform, and was willing to continue
paying maintenance. The vendor felt he could play hardball, however, to
the tune of almost $100,000.
When I was asked for alternatives, I mentioned SourceRetrieval as a place
that could provide the method to recreate the license checking program on
the new machine. They told me to make it happen, and ordered the newer,
bigger machine. The decompilation cost less than $1,000.
The vendor was willing to renegotiate with my client when the client
started faxing a copy of the source listing (one page per day for a week)
to them. When the vendor issued the key for the new serial number, my
client's attorney delivered the tape containing the source code to the
vendor.
-----midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Shannon O'Donnell" <shannon.odonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 12/08/2006 03:16PM
Subject: RE: RPG Decompilers (moved from CPF000)
I don't know that I think they are necessarily a terrible idea...
The truth is I just happened to notice an add for them on iSeries
Network when I clicked on a link in an earlier post today about a
utility from Carsten. So I followed the link to the decompiler vendor
website and was reading about it, and that got me to wondering what
other people might think about them. I haven't seen a discussion on
decompilers for a long time.
Heck, I think if you can figure out how to do it, then you've really
done something. That seems like a bit of black magic to me since I doubt
that I'd be able to achieve a decompiler, even if I tried.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:50 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: RPG Decompilers (moved from CPF000)
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Shannon O'Donnell wrote:
>
> What do you think of these?
> http://juggersoft.com/decompilers.htm
>
This is the same company that used to be called "SST Global" (in fact,
if
you watch their animated logo in the upper-left corner of the home page,
it still says "SST Global" at the end of the animation sequence!)
These decompilers have been around for a long time already. I believe
(but don't quote me on this) that SST Global ended up buying out the old
SourceRetrieval.com as well. So these have been around for ages.
Why, all of a sudden, after all these years, do you think they're a bad
idea?
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.