|
From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxx Actually we work with the iSeries Access ODBC, .Net Provider and JDBC quite regularly and we typically achieve sub-second response times, so in my opinion based in experience, performance isn't much of an issue in today's environment.
I never really talked about performance except in the context of applications spanning companies, requiring different environments, and so on. There we have the fundamentally flawed concept of connection pools, simply because the cost of creating a connection is so high. But the problem is that the connections can't have any persistence (like, oh, say, a library list), so you have to have persistent connections, which removes the benefits of connection pooling in the first place, or you have to hardcode your environment settings on every SQL call, which nobody does in modern programming.
In terms of managing library lists, if we put SQL into a business object, we have properties that get set in the business object to control library lists for the data. We also qualify our SQL with the library name where the tables reside. Seems to work quite well and give us complete control over which library we're accessing.
Oops. Okay, SOME people hardcode library names <grin>. Welcome to the 1980s! Seriously, though, that's one of the two big problems with thick-client programming: you end up using outmoded concepts like hardcoded libraries (and user IDs and passwords) in order to get around the basic shortcomings of the operating system. The second, of course, is the age-old problem of distribution of program changes. But that's a completely different subject.
<A little soapboxing> (...) For the seasoned iSeries developers, a nice happy medium is the concept of using stored procedures to access data from a business layer. The concept of calling an RPG stored procedure and returning a result set lets all the SQL access live in the iSeries database and within RPG programs. (...) </A little soapboxing>
Exactly. Use stored procedures to call RPG and get rid of the ODBC direct access to the tables, especially in update mode. And not only that, your business logic doesn't have to be in SQL, either! It can use SQL when appropriate, and native I/O when the logic is too complex or data-driven for standard SQL. But in neither case should you allow unfettered ODBC access to your database, and especially not in update mode. ODBC is NOT SQL. ODBC is bad. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.