× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. October 2006

RE: CISC to RISC Circa 2006 (was RE: V5R4 upgrade from V5R3)

James,

There were on V3R2 - think they were concerned about stuff like that ? :-)

Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James H H Lampert
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:40 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: CISC to RISC Circa 2006 (was RE: V5R4 upgrade from V5R3)

Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


The "only" issues that have come up are security issues 
due to the fact that the V3R2 was running at seclvl=10
and they went to 40.


Security 10?!?!?

Did you read them the riot act?

I have a poster I designed many years ago about security 
levels. I just stuck a PDF of it online
http://www.hb.quik.com/jamesl/SecOnAS400.pdf

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.