|
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx Ain't the format name that's different. I verified that with testing of the DSPFD and DSPFFD. I also showed you the V5R4 RCDFMT clause I was using.
I didn't see your message before I posted mine. Hmmm. Then either our collective assumption about how the hash value is computed is wrong, or else SQL is computing it differently. The latter would, in my estimation, be a bug. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.