|
Here is the story: I have a customer who, about 2 years ago, dropped support for a product that, as a third party, used JWalk for their GUI. They upgraded their box to a new i5 and the third party wanted $60,000 to "get them current" so they could get a new license for JWalk. This is for a P05 box that barely cost that so, of course, they looked for alternatives. We are slowly implementing HATS as an alternative but "slowly" is the problem. They really need to either get back to JWalk running on their old box for a while longer or find a quick alternative for the interim.
So here is the question: I know nothing about JWalk or how it is configured but I wonder if it is possible to configure it so that the old 270 is the server but we point it to the new 520 for applications and data? I don't know enough about the JWalk architecture to know if this is possible but it would get them out of the crack that they are in.
If you are a JWalk user and know something about how it operates and is configured, I could use a few pointers (and some good news...)
Thanks, Pete Helgren
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
