|
Running 8 arms on the embedded controller plus the 5727 doesn't come highly recommended from our BP or the graphs we've modeled. The models we ran in Performance Navigator when planning the system gave us slightly better disk arm usage graphs when putting 4 arms on the embedded and 4 on the 5776. We need the 8 arms moreso for disk arm performance rather than the capacity, so losing the additional overhead to RAID isn't hurting us. This box is a Domino/Websphere workload that doesn't impact the CPW immensely, but we've had disk arm and IOP concerns on the current 800 before we went from 6 arms on a 5702 (no cache) to a 2757 (SUPER cache). The Cadillac approach would be to get the expansion and the 5580 setup, but this would still require half of the 8 drives to be RAIDed on the embedded controller with the 5580 only driving 4 drives. There's about a $25K price differential (with 3 years of HW maint included) in going with that setup, and we're not sure it's worth it (a decision we're finalizing tomorrow). The graphs with the CEC only approach seem to show that it should handle the disk arm/IOP workloads with the embedded/5727/5776 setup. Also supporting that notion is the fact that we take the current 800's workload and run it for a day each month on another 520 that has a 5709 controller driving 8 drives (with no apparent performance issues). Good points about the strategy you mention for larger and partitioned systems... i'll keep it in mind for future situations we may run in to! Another situation of ours is that we lease the iSeries/i5 equipment for 3 years typically and when we upgrade or purchase a new one, the complete old system gets shipped back. "Trevor Perry" <tperry@cleartech nologies.net> To Sent by: "Midrange Systems Technical midrange-l-bounce Discussion" s@xxxxxxxxxxxx <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc 07/06/2006 11:59 Subject AM Re: New 520+ Shipment Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@midra nge.com> Chad, Why are you putting in two disk controllers? Are there two partitions? There are some reasons why encouraging you to put your disks outside the CEC are a good idea. We are finding more and more that if we partition, and put the drives in expansion units, it is much easier to upgrade. The new CEC replaces the old CEC and the partitions are already finished - no unload/reload. The less stuff in the CEC, the better. Of course, since that applies to larger machines, it does not help the smaller business. I am sure IBM is listening, and they are incorporating high speed disk IOP into their iSis design.. Trevor ----- Original Message ----- From: <ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: New 520+ Shipment It will be a 1 CPU 7143 520+ with 4GB Ram, 8 35gb drives, 1200/60 CPW. Pretty far down the food chain... ;) It will come in around either $60k or $80k after the added MES items depending on the disk controller approach we choose (5727 and 5776 in CEC or 5727 in CEC and 5580 in an 0595 expansion). The discount isn't spec'd yet, but should be in the 15%-18% range i'm guessing. As far as features, the worst part is having to add an expansion to run the 2757/2780/5580 type controllers... this is a killer to the small simple system concept. The 800 we're upgrading from has the 2757 in the CEC and is fine. The current restrictions preventing the souped up controllers in the CEC is a very bad design IMO. -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. _____________________________________________________________________________ Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com _____________________________________________________________________________ ForwardSourceID:NT0004B372
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.