Re: OS/400 version & Client Access version -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: OS/400 version & Client Access version
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:21:23 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

fu_james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Is it possible that we leave Client Access for Windows V5R1 alone? Anyone
have any experience with the situation?


I'm pretty sure that the basic display & print functions of Client
Access are not version dependent, so you should have no problems with those.

We have lots of people who are using the original version of CA
installed on their workstations many years ago but upgraded the iSeries
a number of times.

Navigator functionality, I'm not sure about.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.