RE: TSM on Linux hosted on i5 outperforms TSM running on i5/os PASE. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: TSM on Linux hosted on i5 outperforms TSM running on i5/os PASE.
From: Jim Oberholtzer <JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:26:28 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
The issue appears to be differences in the device drivers required for
sharing in an OS-400/PASE environment versus a standalone AIX/Linux
environment.
</snip>

The issue with the TSM using the API, is the API code was just really slow 
by comparison to a direct attach device. 

Why the API is so blasted slow is anyone's guess.  I think just bad code. 

Jim

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.