Re: [CPF0000] The globalization of COMMON, or is this the right direction? -- MIDRANGE-L

Joe,

Suggesting you were whining is a far cry from "intellectually lazyindividual". Whining is whining, and it goes on here all the time - whetherthey agree with me or not. Did I specifically call you on whining? No.Calling me names is a different thing. If you lost your argument on a spoof,and if calling me names makes you feel better, so be it.

I have not switched my position. I believe globalization is inevitable andpositive. Your one google search shows my numbers were wrong, but I stillbelieve that an investment by the US into India will return tenfold to theUS. How is that a switch? What on earth are you talking about? I think youhave me confused with someone else - I am definitely willing to concede apoint when I am wrong, but concession is not a switch. I would like to thinkI have learned from this debate, but as soon as you start calling me namesand telling me I have switched, confusion reigns.

You, yourself, are not a man of your word - in this email you say "I'llrefrain from further discourse" and you took another opportunity to fire oneat me in another email - shall I call you on your switch?

You made a fool of yourself debating the spoof - you don't have to take itout on me.


Trevor

----- Original Message -----From: "Joe Pluta"Subject: RE: [CPF0000] The globalization of COMMON,or is this the rightdirection?

Trevor, you started the name calling by categorizing those who disagreewithyou as "whiners". You have a finely honed capability of doing somethingand
then slamming others who do the same, and of switching positions in an
eyeblink. I take back the "intellectually lazy" and stick with myoriginalimpression of you: "intellectually deceitful". With that, I'll refrainfrom
further discourse.

Joe
From: Trevor Perry

Can we debate without you calling names? Or is that required by you and
your ilk?