|
You will need to use a WinDOHs based PC if you want to use graphical disk management but that's small potatoes and no reason to select LAN console in this environment.
Some clod suggested Twinax. I gotta find that guy and smack him. :-) IMHO there is no justifiable reason to ever use a twinax console again. Ever.
- Larry Haase, Justin C. wrote:
HMC! Keyword: reliability.Reasons: remote firmware updating, all-in-one management, less physical machines to manage, etc. I have never had a HMC console fail me. I can't think of a reason to do LAN console vs HMC in this situation. -- Justin C. Haase - iSeries System Engineer IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i Kingland Systems Corporation For a non-LPAR shop running 3 different 520s in 2 different locations (2 at one site and 1 at the other), would you choose an HMC or a LAN Console setup? Reliability, security, and managability are the main concerns rather than a difference in cost.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
