|
Steve Richter wrote:
Steve - I was talking about programming - not program execution. Using faster hardware doesn't improve the process of coding.On 5/9/06, Rob Dixon <rob.dixon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:We got hijacked and taken down a blind alley.I thought Trevor had some very interesting things to say.Let's try and get back on track. I asked - it seems eons ago - "Can we design an architecture that will make us more efficient?" I don't think that many people will regard present methods as efficient - just the best that they know. There are many reasons for this, but I would like to concentrate here on just one of these - programming. Whatever the language or the architecture, programming is a most inefficient process, as I said earlier, "the most inefficient process ever devised by mankind in any field of human endeavour".oh brother. The solution is p5 pricing of the hardware so there is noshortage of CPW to run modern, modular software.
Rob
Also needed is a common, all purpose programming language and run time that runs on all IBM platforms. Java if it has to be, but better something like the .NET CLI. That way programmers have the choice of programming languages but still gain the ability to reuse class libraries written in other languages.
-Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.