Re: WRKSBMJOB taking a long time.

["rick baird" <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for all the replies - just after I wrote the question, I left
town for a few days and forgot I even asked it until today, when I
tried WRKSBMJOB again.

I'll look into DSPJOBTBL.

thanks,

Rick

On 4/28/06, DeLong, Eric <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, don't increase.....  OS400 will automatically allocate additional
> "permanent job structures" as it needs them.  The problem comes when a
> command is run that searches through the job tables.  If there are many
> table entries, the search is slow...
>
> The correct fix is to decrease the number of job table entries.
>
> Eric DeLong
> Sally Beauty Company
> MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
> 940-297-2863 or ext. 1863
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Mac
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:31 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: RE: WRKSBMJOB taking a long time.
>
>
> DSPJOBTBL ... you may need to increase how many are out there.
>
> >DSPSYSSTS.  How many jobs are on the system?  We're running a pretty
> >sturdy 570.  Even at off-peak times it can take 10-15 seconds to pull up
> >WRKSBMJOB.  We have over 60,000 jobs on the system.  I would venture a
> >guess that the OS is digging through the job tables, and it isn't using
> >an efficient retrieval method.
> >
> >Q:      How do you delete a spool file?
> >
> >A:      Print it and throw it away.
> >
> >
> >-Jim
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rick baird
> >Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:01 PM
> >To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> >Subject: WRKSBMJOB taking a long time.
> >
> >Would any of you have an idea why a simple WRKSBMJOB command (no
> >parms) would take 15-20 seconds to load?
> >
> >When I run it, it only displays 2 entries and it doesn't seem to make
> >a difference who runs it, it takes forever.
> >
> >refresh takes as long as well.
> >
> >I've been on busier systems than this, so it doesn't seem to make any
> >sense to me.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Rick
> >
> >
> >--
> >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> >To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> >at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.