|
Does anyone know if IBM still publishes the "DASD Arms Required for Performance" type worksheets for the i5 models? I've used them in the past as an additional measure of insurance when designing a new system, but the last time I used one was for an 800. We're starting to spec out a new 520 to replace the 800 and with the Domino and Websphere workloads I KNOW we've had disk arm/controller issues in the past, so I want to ensure a good config. The 800 was originally spec'ed by the previous admin/BP with a 5702 controlling 6 mirrored drives and the box performed horribly. I got it switched over to a RAIDed 2757 and made a positive impact (and want that to carry over to the new box!). In addition to the DASD arms worksheet, i'm looking for some input on the 757mb cache and 40mb cache RAID controllers available for the i5s. We're hoping to keep this box to just a system enclosure and I think with the 520s all the 757mb controllers are not permitted in the system enclosure. Is this true? If so, i'm wondering how a 40mb controller will fare in comparison to the current 2757 (757mb cache) we're running. I would hate to take a step backwards on the disk cache... Domino seems to love the increased disk cache.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.