|
On 4/12/06, David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Neil Palmer wrote: > > 1) Would you be in favor of IBM Open Sourcing RPG ? > > (give reasons why or why not if you want) > > To gain what? survival. > > It's not like RPG is a popular language in the open source community ... > and what would the advantage be? Rapid adaptation to modern > technologies? One of the strengths of RPG (indeed the iSeries, or > whatever it's called today, itself) is stability. To make the RPG > compiler open source invites customizations ... what happens when a > vendor takes the RPG compiler and customizes it to their own end ... > nobody else would be able to use programs based on that customization > without having the modified compiler source. This makes things less > stable. Plus, modifications to the compiler would probably not go > through the same rigorous QA that IBM does. wait a minute. I thought QA was a selling point for open source. This system of ours is fading into oblivion. The only ways to save it are massive R&D by IBM or open sourcing the entire OS. Either way it should run on the p5 and be priced at AIX and Linux levels. IBM should use the OS as a way to sell DB2 and p5 hardware. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.