× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. March 2006

Re: More specifics Re: Something lighter than a database file . . .

On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 10:04 -0800, James H H Lampert wrote:

> Likewise, a *USRIDX (and maybe also a keyed *DTAQ as well; 
> I haven't read through all the docs on them yet) doesn't 
> appear to have any way to retrieve in arrival sequence, so 
> it would, by itself, leave us with no way of knowing which 
> requests we'd processed and which ones we hadn't.

How about rolling your own?  I wanted a list that I could extend at
will, so I wrote a simple linked list module.  Perhaps you could use
something similar?

http://code.midrange.com/index.php?id=2d5be1efe1


It is trivial to scan the list for duplicates, but it takes linear time.

Regards,
Rich

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.