|
Hi MichaelIs there a reason you can't just run the whole process in batch ? This is how I normally construct this kind of process.
I realise you probably can't re-engineer things to that extent, but I am curious to understand why you chose to do things the way you it sounds like they are done ?
What happens if the terminal is inadvertently disconnected ? Regards Evan Harris At 06:24 a.m. 7/03/2006, you wrote:
We run an interact job to monitor the end of the actual "Back-up". In the interact job, we end the subsystems. If the Operator ran the back up from the second session, the back up would be canceled when the subsystems were being brought down. This would also prevent all the after "Back-up" steps that are performed to restart the system from executing. Michael Schutte Work 614-492-7419 email michael_schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.