|
Joe,Maybe you could tell us how to use the JIT compiler for the same purpose so that we could compare the two?
--- Scott Klement http://www.scottklement.com On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Joe Pluta wrote:
According to people who are a lot smarter than me, CRTJVAPGM is deprecated in favor of the JIT compiler, especially in later releases of the JVM. It seems that the JIT compiler can do a better job of optimization based on the actual usage of a piece of code than CRTJVAPGM can, since the latter is based solely on static information. This has evidently been the case since about V5R1 or V5R2. Don't hold me to that, though. I haven't run any benchmarks to identify which might be faster. It's worth a shot, and as Scott says, let us know what happens. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.