|
Number 2 isn't true at all. I've written at least 10 How-To articles on using VARPG for IT Jungle. Unless it's true what they say, and my Mother IS! The only one who ever reads what I write. Hmmm.... -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Franz Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 11:28 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: VARPG (was Design Change Requests) >I don't know why VARPG can't gain traction Marco... 1. Because IBM rarely even mentions the product... 2. Over the years it's only been casually mentioned in the trade press - a few articles, a few books, and as usual, many of us tried it out in it's very early days had problems. 3. Because many software vendors went the other routes (c##,java,vb) so they could write to more than 1 platform, and those languages were recognized by the world outside of iSeries. IT buyers are often looking for the most "popular" language, counting on a steady supply of (cheap) coders 4. the already mentioned "thick client" maintenance issues (i also wish more had adopted it. the iSeries could be far better accepted in the marketplace if perceived as graphical). just my opinion jim franz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:02 PM Subject: Re: VARPG (was Design Change Requests) >I don't know why VARPG can't gain traction Marco. I find it frustrating > to see firms embrace Windows but avoid VARPG. Where I've seen it tried, > people like it. > > > > Marco Facchinetti wrote: >> --- Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>>Oh. Then it is a design issue. >>> >>>VARPG uses a runtime environment. If you try to use that model then, >>>yes, updates would be tiresome. >>> >>>However the runtime is only about 15 megs. Building it into the >>>application locks the two together, and updates are no longer an issue. >>> I stored the application (including runtime) on a server. When a user >>>opens the desktop version, the desktop version checks to see if its >>>still King. If not, it replaces itself with the newer version. >>>Downloading 20 megs once in a while from a server is not much of a >>>burden imho. >>> >>>Still, the fact remains, VARPG can't gain traction. >>> >> >> >> Why?? >> >> Marco >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > ----------------------------------- > Booth Martin > http://martinvt.com > ----------------------------------- > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing > list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.