× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Actually I was talking about both, sometimes I pass in the parameters for 
the SQL statement and other times I have used it in a static setup.


On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:34:09 -0600, Vernon Hamberg wrote
> Pre-V5R2 or so (pre-SQE, i.e.) the same engine processed both, so 
> there was basically no difference. SQE is not used for Query/400, 
> only for actual SQL statements. Your mileage will vary here, as some 
> things work better in the CQE (classic query engine), some better in 
> the SQE (SQL query engine).
> 
> Query/400 might handle optimization at the time the query is created,
>  but this is not going to help if you change the name of the file(s) 
> and/or library the query will run upon.
> 
> I'm inclined to get away from Query/400 as much as possible. If you 
> want the formatted report, use QM forms. STRQM is where you can 
> manage these, and the interface is very much like Query/400. And the 
> greater flexibility and functionality of the SQL you can put into QM 
> queries is much greater than that of Query/400, IMO. The only thing 
> Query/400 does more easily is summary-only reports, AFAIK.
> 
> If you want ad hoc queries, QM queries come to the rescue again - 
> look in Google for EXCSQLSTM to download an example. There are some 
> problems with this approach that can bite you in certain extremes 
> and boundary conditions.
> 
> Embedded SQL has 2 kinds - static and dynamic - are you referring to 
> dynamic, passing in the statement?
> 
> HTH
> Vern
> 
> At 11:05 AM 12/21/2005, you wrote:
> 
> >Are there any performance issues to consider when looking at embedded SQL
> >versus Query400?
> >
> >It seems that Query400 might actually run faster, but I can definitely see
> >the advantages of creating an SQL statement on the fly per se.
> >
> >Thoughts, comments? Tell me I'm nuts....ok skip the last one, that's a 
given.
> >
> >
> >If you bought it, it was hauled by a truck - somewhere, sometime.
> >
> >--
> >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
> >To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> >at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) 
> mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To 
> subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: 
> http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: 
> MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment 
> to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


If you bought it, it was hauled by a truck - somewhere, sometime.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.