|
Rich, There's no question in my mind about PDF being a robust specification for precision layout. But it seems to me that HTML and CSS also provide a good specification for precision layout, using syntax that's more readable, and is supported by a number of exceptional WYSIWYG editors. It seems to me that stylized HTML reports can be generated more efficiently and easily than PDF reports. There's no need for intermediate XML syntax, which is typically used to define report layout, or need for separate WYSIWYG editors designed to generate XML report templates. There's no need to generate intermediate XML files, and no need to process them through a converter to generate PDF files. When delivered from a Web site, there's no need to load an extra "reader" to display and print the files. My problem isn't with HTML or CSS, which are good for page layout and page-breaks. My problem is with the notion of instructing browser users to access the File=>Page Setup dialog, and possibly the File->Print Preview dialog, in order to configure browser print settings to be compatible with the intended report, before the report can be printed. It seems to me that there should be some way in HTML/CSS/JavaScript to tell the browser to NOT add extra headers, footers, and margins, for printing, for example. Nathan Andelin --------------------------------- Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.