|
<snip> one of these days, they're going to setup a server that's a lab server, give each attendee a unique id/pw, IP addr, a CD of required software with 30 license and let us hammer at labs from our rooms or over the inhouse/conf net. </snip> Don, How much would you be willing to increase the cost of COMMON to do that? Remember there are a ton of security, legal, and direct costs associated with your suggestion. How about you volunteer to lead the committee to discover what those issues are and present a recommendation to the CET to provide for the function and how to pay for it all. Don't suggest we drop the instructor led LABs in favor of the remote ones. The costs won't be offset, and the membership would not approve. Why is it always the "they" that have to do this stuff? I though COMMON was a user group, so the "they" is "us". Jim Oberholtzer
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.