|
I agree with you but the client is looking for objective data. The users are complaining about response time and they want to know if changing to a faster wireless network will help. I wrote a test program and I have noticed a signifigent difference between my PC using Client Access and the dumb terminal that we have for a console. The dumb terminal is much slower, although it is still a small fraction of a second. Albert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones, John (US)" To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" Subject: RE: Measuring network transmission times Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:44:44 -0500 In general I agree. Back in the 'good old days' when we ran BPCS on a B50, we commonly had 19.2Kbps leased lines that supported upwards of 50 devices. Maybe 5 line/barcode printers, 20 PC Support devices, with the rest being dumb terminals. Very low-bandwidth; very efficient. Of course, that was SNA and we prioritized the 5250 over the print traffic, but overall, line speed was never an issue. 802.11b is 11Mbps or about 600 times the bandwidth of that old 19.2 line. 802.11g is 54Mbps; even faster. Heck, my Treo using cellular data averages 70-110Kbps or around 4 times faster and that's only supporting a single 5250 session. -- John A. Jones, CISSP Americas Information Security Officer Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. V: +1-630-455-2787 F: +1-312-601-1782 john.jones@xxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wilt, Charles Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:06 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: Measuring network transmission times IMHO, You're wasting your time. The 5250 protocol dates back to 300 baud dial-up lines. The amount of data transmitted is very low. Unless you're trying to squeeze 1,000s of users onto a single wireless access point, it's highly unlikely you'd even come close to maxing out the wireless bandwidth. HTH, Charles Wilt -- iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America ph: 513-573-4343 fax: 513-398-1121 > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Albert York > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:14 AM > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > Subject: Measuring network transmission times > > > I have a client who is evaluating different 5250 emulation devices in > a wireless network environment.. They would like to determine what > the transmission time is for each of the devices. I would like to > write a program which would send a screen to the device and have the > device immedatelty return a response. I do not have any ability to > program any of the devices so it would have to be straight 5250. I > have tried using the CHECK(ER) but that still requires manual > input. If it can't be done in DDS is there a UDDS string which would > accomplish what I need? > > Thanks, > > Albert York > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, > unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please > take a moment to review the archives at > http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > > -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in the future then please respond to the sender to this effect. -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.