|
Dave, If you want to continue your home grown package (and nothing wrong with that) I would suggest to place all new and adapted objects in a seperate library. At the time to do the upgrade you do it from that library. Regards, Carel Teijgeler *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 1-7-05 at 12:59 Smith, Dave wrote: >The request is to move to a methodology where we schedule all our >changes to go into production at the same time (Maybe one time per >month) which one person will manage. We've been asked to think about >it and how we would implement something like this. I do not have a >lot of experience with the large change management packages available >for iSeries shops nor do I think my customer would be willing to foot >the bill for such a package. > >For those of you not using a change management package, are any of you >doing this where everyone's changes are going live at one time and if so >how are you managing it? > >For those of you using a packaged change management system that manages >all this for you, what is it and how long did it take to move into that >environment and become productive with it? >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.