Re: Strange Performance Problems

Nope, not a proble with the cache battery. First thing the admin checked.

On 6/27/05, Kirk Goins <kgoins@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Once a long time ago I lost "cache" on the CPU and had a heck of a time
> finding the error message. In more recent times, I find performance
> problems after an IPL. This turns out to be the Raid5 Controller's Cache
> Battery finally went bad. If you haven't checked WRKPRB, try a WRKDSKSTS
> and then F11. If status is Active....nevermind, If it says Degraded...
> write caching has been disabled. get the $35 battery replaced.
> 
> 
> 
> Mike Wills wrote:
> 
> >I hope I can get you accurate information here.
> >
> >We have an LPARed 810 (we have 66% of the CPU) and just recently started 
> to
> >notice some slow down. Last Thursday a job that normally takes 15 
> minutes,
> >took 4 hours. Friday and Wednesday (without any changes in between) ran
> >normally.Now this last weekend, we did a test upgrade of our ERP software
> >and many of the jobs are now taking about twice the time. Here are some
> >stats on this:
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
>